± mixed
Minnesota's ban on nudification tools should not be frozen: xAI waited until the last minute to sue and alleges only unsubstantiated financial loss, so it has shown no irreparable harm; and because it brought a facial challenge before the law was ever enforced, it must show the statute's unconstitutional applications outweigh its constitutional ones — which it effectively concedes it cannot.
The irreparable-harm half was adopted in full on 4 September: the court found unreasonable delay, called xAI's cost evidence "vague and conclusory" and its lost-user claim speculative. The facial-challenge half was not reached — the court left the First Amendment question to the state's pending motion to dismiss (order, Doc. 54).