Investors approached OpenAI this week about a new round at a $1.2 trillion valuation. Reuters, relaying the Financial Times, says talks are early, investor-initiated, and the figure could move; CNBC, on its own sources, says no formal discussions are under way and that some investors have pitched the round as employee liquidity. OpenAI declined to comment. What has actually closed: $122 billion of committed capital in March at an $852 billion valuation, and a roughly $7 billion employee share sale in August. The company’s own people give two timetables. Sam Altman called listing now ‘ill-advised’ on safety grounds and ruled out 2026; his chief financial officer told an August all-hands that OpenAI ‘will be a public company in 2027’, sooner if the business keeps inflecting. The prospectus was filed confidentially with the SEC in June. Dell’Oro puts worldwide data-centre capital spending up 92 per cent in the second quarter, driven by AI demand and by memory and storage prices lifting server prices — so some of that growth is the same machines costing more. Neoclouds and model builders grew fastest.
The Whole Story
Hundreds of billions of dollars a year are being committed to AI infrastructure against revenues that remain a fraction of that figure. Two opposing arguments about how that ends have circulated since 2024, and they are not the same argument: one says the industry is building far more capacity than anyone will pay for, crushing prices and returns; the other says the inputs — chips, power, memory, land — are scarce enough that costs outrun what customers will bear. They operate on different markets and different clocks, they could even happen in sequence, and the only honest way to choose between them is to watch the indicators. So the record kept here is of reported capital expenditure, reported revenue, utilisation and prices, alongside every dated bubble call and boom call made on the record and the evidence that has since come in against it.
The financing has changed instrument roughly once a year. It began in 2019 with Microsoft's $1 billion into OpenAI paired with an exclusive commitment to buy Microsoft's compute — capital and a purchase order moving together, a template every large deal since has echoed. January 2025 set the ceiling of ambition when OpenAI, Oracle, SoftBank and MGX announced Stargate at the White House, a stated intention to invest $500 billion over four years, and September 2025 set the pattern of a supplier funding its own customers when Nvidia committed up to $100 billion to OpenAI. When internal cash ran short the capital markets opened, first for debt and then for equity: Alphabet raised $84.75 billion in June 2026, the largest such transaction ever completed by a listed company. The newest instrument is the guarantee, and it is now a filed obligation rather than a report. In August 2026 Nvidia entered residual value guaranties standing behind OpenAI's 20-year lease of a 10-gigawatt campus in southern Ohio, capped at $105 billion and payable if the tenant becomes insolvent or stops paying — cut from the roughly $250 billion first reported, after Nvidia's own shareholders objected to the exposure. Google has moved the same way from the other side, agreeing to stand behind Anthropic's lease payments in an arrangement worth about $35 billion. Broadcom has done the same from a third direction and put it in its accounts: a backstop on a customer's five-year leases of racks built from Broadcom's own chips, filed at a maximum exposure of $29 billion. Supplier equity in a customer has become supplier credit for that customer's borrowing.
The reported figures are now catching up with the commitments, and they point both ways. Leaked audited accounts verified by the Financial Times showed OpenAI generating $13.07 billion of revenue in 2025 against $34 billion of spending; the private laboratories otherwise disclose annualised run rates to investors rather than audited revenue to markets, and the two are not the same measure. Among the listed spenders, Alphabet's second quarter of 2026 brought the first negative free-cash-flow quarter in its history as a public company, and Meta's brought a 91% fall to $784 million while operating profit dropped 8% on record revenue. Microsoft is the counter-case: a record $41 billion quarter of capital spending funded from operating cash, Azure past $100 billion of annual revenue, and an order book of $678 billion that grew 25% even after stripping OpenAI out of it. Microsoft has also begun the accounting adjustments that come with a long build, stretching the assumed life of its data centres from 15 years to 25.
What remains unsettled is whether any of this earns a return, and the calls that will decide it are already dated. David Cahn's $600 billion question of June 2024 asked how much end-user revenue the capex implies; the denominator has since roughly doubled while the revenue side has barely moved. Michael Burry's accusation that hyperscalers understate depreciation by extending useful lives now has its first live test in Microsoft's schedule change — on buildings rather than the chips he named. Jensen Huang and Andy Jassy have each staked figures on demand being real, and Huang has now staked $105 billion of his company's balance sheet on a single tenant paying its rent. Most of these resolve no earlier than 2027, which is the point: the arguments are years old and the evidence is only now arriving.